Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
Gate MCP
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 30+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
I almost accidentally clicked "Approve" during the vote just now... When I was copying the link to check the details, I also pasted the wrong address, my heart skipped a beat, and I quickly withdrew and reopened the page. To put it simply, many proposal texts are quite righteous, but when I turn to the budget/incentive sections, I start to drift: the testnet incentives and points expectations are written like "let's give some candy first," and then below, they casually add permissions into a new multi-signature/group, with a particularly loose execution stance. Everyone is guessing whether the mainnet will issue tokens, but I don't really care whether they do or not; I'm more worried about the hidden move of "fixing the power structure in advance just to wait for the airdrop." Anyway, I still stick to my old habit: first see who gets the money, how long it will take to distribute, and who can stop it; if these aren't clear, I continue to oppose.