Blockstream CEO Adam Back dropped some interesting thoughts on X about Satoshi’s legendary vanishing act—and it’s not just about internet paranoia.
Here’s the thing: running a P2P network that messes with money and privacy? That’s been risky business for decades. But Bitcoin? Bitcoin is playing a different game entirely.
As Back points out, while file-sharing networks faced heat, Bitcoin directly challenges state control over currency. That’s not just tech disruption—that’s geopolitical. Bearer assets that operate outside government authority hit a completely different risk level.
The math is brutal: early Bitcoin devs who went public faced real danger in hostile jurisdictions. Even today, while some countries are warming up to crypto, plenty still treat it as gray-area or straight-up illegal.
Satoshi’s move? Probably not paranoia. More like calculated risk management. Release the network anonymously, let it decentralize, and nobody becomes a single target for regulatory hammers or worse.
It’s actually genius—the protocol speaks louder than any founder ever could. The absence became the feature.
Worth thinking about: what other groundbreaking tech needed its creator to disappear to actually survive?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Why Did Satoshi Really Disappear? Adam Back Just Revealed the Real Answer
Blockstream CEO Adam Back dropped some interesting thoughts on X about Satoshi’s legendary vanishing act—and it’s not just about internet paranoia.
Here’s the thing: running a P2P network that messes with money and privacy? That’s been risky business for decades. But Bitcoin? Bitcoin is playing a different game entirely.
As Back points out, while file-sharing networks faced heat, Bitcoin directly challenges state control over currency. That’s not just tech disruption—that’s geopolitical. Bearer assets that operate outside government authority hit a completely different risk level.
The math is brutal: early Bitcoin devs who went public faced real danger in hostile jurisdictions. Even today, while some countries are warming up to crypto, plenty still treat it as gray-area or straight-up illegal.
Satoshi’s move? Probably not paranoia. More like calculated risk management. Release the network anonymously, let it decentralize, and nobody becomes a single target for regulatory hammers or worse.
It’s actually genius—the protocol speaks louder than any founder ever could. The absence became the feature.
Worth thinking about: what other groundbreaking tech needed its creator to disappear to actually survive?