Venom's dynamic sharding claiming 500k transactions per day sounds impressive on paper. But here's what I'm curious about - can the scalability actually hold up under real stress? Performance metrics are one thing, sustained throughput under varying network conditions is another game entirely.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
23 Likes
Reward
23
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
down_only_larry
· 11-25 11:18
Really, 500k tps sounds amazing but I just want to see the data from the Mainnet stress test, anyone can boast about paper numbers.
View OriginalReply0
LiquiditySurfer
· 11-24 13:51
Real network stress testing is the key; anyone can boast about paper data. Whether Venom can stabilize this 500k is what really matters.
View OriginalReply0
DataPickledFish
· 11-23 14:52
500k tps sounds impressive, but you'll know the reality during the mainnet stress test.
View OriginalReply0
ProofOfNothing
· 11-23 14:51
500k tps sounds good, but can it really withstand the moment of market turmoil... I'm a bit skeptical.
View OriginalReply0
MetaMuskRat
· 11-23 14:51
500k/day sounds impressive, but how long can you actually keep it up on the real battlefield? Paper data and actual operation are two completely different things.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-74b10196
· 11-23 14:31
Well... 500,000 transactions per day sounds good, but can it actually withstand the pressure when running? The surface data looks nice, but the real test is yet to come.
Venom's dynamic sharding claiming 500k transactions per day sounds impressive on paper. But here's what I'm curious about - can the scalability actually hold up under real stress? Performance metrics are one thing, sustained throughput under varying network conditions is another game entirely.