CryptoWorld News reports that Polymarket said that 27% of clinicians stated that AI has helped them find at least three potential medical errors in the past three months.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • 2
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
BluePeonyDarkroom
· 3h ago
27% of this data is quite interesting, indicating that the medical community's acceptance of AI-assisted diagnosis is climbing, but what about the remaining 73%? Are they not using it or do they not trust it?
View OriginalReply0
Re-StakingSucculents
· 3h ago
The actual penetration rate of AI in medical scenarios is higher than imagined
View OriginalReply0
TakeAScreenshotBefore
· 3h ago
Does Polymarket's data come from self-reporting by doctors or system logs? The gap between subjective recall and objective records could be quite significant.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-5578154d
· 4h ago
Three incorrect interceptions may not seem like much, but in a clinical setting, they could be three lives. The key question is whether these 27% of doctors have developed dependence or if they are just triggering alerts occasionally.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pinned