Someone in the group is again sharing a screenshot about "a certain stablecoin losing its peg," so I casually checked the project's GitHub and audit reports to see if it's solid evidence or just emotional speculation.

For newcomers, I think it's better not to get caught up in technical details when assessing credibility; focus on three things first:
Is the code maintained by someone long-term (not just a bunch of commits overnight)?
Does the audit reflect the "latest version" and not just an old report used as a shield?
Are the upgrade permissions multi-signed with sufficiently decentralized signers (preferably also seeing who the signers are and if they've been changed)?
Basically, when topics like regulation and reserve audits heat up, people tend to mistake "possible" for "confirmed."
Right now, before jumping to conclusions based on rumors, check the permissions and update paths clearly, then decide whether to get involved—so you don't get carried away by group sentiment.