These days, I’ve been analyzing a few small groups on the chain that look like “coincidental transfers,” and the more I look, the more I think we shouldn’t jump to conclusions too quickly. Take your time and break down the path: first see if they originate from the same source of funds split off (same incoming, then split into different addresses), then check if there’s a fixed “parking lot” contract/relay address in the middle, and finally look at large pools like exchange deposits and withdrawals. Many so-called coincidences are actually the same operational habits + a time window coincidence, making it look like someone is operating in the dark.

Social mining, fan tokens, and that set-up are also similar. They say attention is mining, but I have some doubts... Attention can drift, but on-chain traces are actually more honest: whether funds are willing to slowly flow back, whether they keep looping around, basically reflect emotions. Anyway, I’d rather confirm the path a bit more slowly than trust just because the “story checks out.”