Researchers support the Ethereum Foundation: its responsibility is not to "pump ETH," but to gradually become less important itself

robot
Abstract generation in progress

ME News message: On May 24 (UTC+8), blockchain researcher and investor William Mougayar posted a defense of the Ethereum Foundation, saying that people outside have long misunderstood the Foundation’s role and that it is “accurately fulfilling its own mission.” Mougayar said that ETH, the Ethereum network, and the Ethereum Foundation itself are three different entities: ETH is an asset, Ethereum is shared computing infrastructure, and the Foundation is a non-profit organization responsible for driving protocol development, one of whose goals is even “to gradually make the founders less and less important.” He noted that many critics want the Foundation to take on duties such as marketing ETH and attracting institutional funding, but that is akin to “expecting the IETF to buy Super Bowl ad slots for TCP/IP.” He emphasized that the Ethereum Foundation is currently following a “subtraction approach,” strengthening the network by pushing protocol upgrades, funding underlying research, and reducing its own centralized influence.

Recently, the Ethereum Foundation has faced criticism from the community for selling ETH, un-staking, and communicating less publicly. Data shows that this month, it has already completed a third OTC sale to BitMine Immersion Technologies, selling a total of approximately 25,000 ETH, worth about $47 million. In addition, the Foundation has recently cumulatively un-staked more than 38,000 ETH, with a total value close to $90 million. (Source: ODaily)

ETH1.87%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 11
  • 1
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
HalfLifeHodler
· 4h ago
Non-profit ≠ inability to sell coins, but the rhythm and disclosure methods of selling coins can indeed be optimized; being criticized this time is not unjustified.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-dcb4d0d5
· 7h ago
25k ETH dump really hurts, but compared to some project teams outright running away, EF is at least still working.
View OriginalReply0
PaperHandsPro
· 8h ago
It's correct to analyze the three separately, but when the market is emotional, none of that matters; the price drops first and asks questions later.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationRaincoat
· 8h ago
Mougayar is an old Ethereum person; his appearance to endorse indicates that there are still knowledgeable people in the circle.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-318a7dc8
· 8h ago
EF has been criticized for selling coins for so many years. Actually, from a different perspective, if they don't sell coins, where does the funding for research and development come from? Non-profit organizations also need to eat.
View OriginalReply0
ColdWalletUnderTheAurora
· 8h ago
Poor communication has been a longstanding difficult problem, and it seems it hasn't been properly fixed since 2017.
View OriginalReply0
FrenBurner
· 8h ago
Criticism aside, EF has indeed never stopped investing in zero-knowledge proofs and L2 over the years.
View OriginalReply0
PerpMoodSwing
· 8h ago
The foundation's focus on grassroots research is correct, but ordinary users are more concerned about whether ETH will drop.
View OriginalReply0
BlueberryStakingMachine
· 8h ago
Lowering centralized influence is a good vision, but the foundation still holds too many chips.
View OriginalReply0
TheMoonReflectsOnTheTranquil
· 8h ago
Protocol upgrades and funding research are both long-term positives, but short-term holders only want to know when the decline will stop.
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pinned