Italian media indirectly confirm the agreement details: Israel has not been excluded from the obligations of the agreement.

robot
Abstract generation in progress

BlockBeats News, May 24 — Regarding the report by The New York Times that "Trump has excluded Israel from the obligations related to the Iran deal," Iran's Fars News Agency stated that this claim is unfounded. According to the clear terms of the agreement, once the deal is finalized, the United States and its allies will commit never to attack Iran and its allies. In exchange, Iran also commits that itself and its allies will not launch a preemptive military strike against the United States and its allies.

Therefore, the media's claim that Israel is exempt from any obligations toward Iran contradicts the explicit provisions of the final agreement and is not true.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 9
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
DAOBackbencher
· 16h ago
So the core controversy is: Israel is considered an 'ally' but is given special treatment in the agreement? That logic doesn't make sense.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-b74aba1c
· 16h ago
The Farce Society reacts so quickly, indicating they care a lot about the international narrative.
View OriginalReply0
MevBreakRoom
· 16h ago
Is the source from The New York Times reliable? Feels like a leak to test the waters.
View OriginalReply0
SpiralSeaSalt
· 16h ago
This plot feels familiar; after signing the agreement, all parties began to vie for interpretive authority.
View OriginalReply0
ReviewMonsterDoesn'tSleep
· 16h ago
Trump: I said exclude, so I exclude. An agreement? What agreement?
View OriginalReply0
SaveABitOnGasFees
· 16h ago
The New York Times' report is a bit outrageous; the agreement clearly states the obligations of allies in black and white, so how can it be unilaterally excluded?
View OriginalReply0
TheNemesisOfFomo
· 16h ago
Middle Eastern agreements are always more complex than they appear, awaiting responses from many more parties.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-94818fd0
· 16h ago
Is the protocol document publicly available? I want to see for myself the scope of the 'ally' definition.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-aa277334
· 16h ago
The Farce Society's response this time is quite tough, directly hitting back with the terms.
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pinned