These past few days, I pressed the "pause" button for myself: stop, watch, and stop brushing. As for the collateralization/sharing security system, honestly, it's just breaking the risk of the same principal into several layers and then selling you the "compound returns" idea. The numbers look pretty, but when things go wrong, it's also layered—don't just layer illusions.

My current approach is very simple: first, stop and read the rules from start to finish, asking myself three questions—how long is the funds truly locked, are the conditions for penalties and confiscation clearly written, and who is issuing the returns (and who might default). Recently, on-chain data tools and tagging systems have been criticized for lagging or misleading, so I don't dare to rely on just one dashboard. I prefer to wait two more days and check multiple sources. Anyway, taking a slower approach isn't a big deal; the cost of a crash is much higher. That's it for now.