Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 40+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
Recently, I've been looking at the APYs of a few yield aggregators again. The numbers look pretty attractive, but just thinking about the fact that behind them are a series of contracts and a bunch of counterparties makes me hesitant to jump in. To put it simply, the "revenue" you get might be from lending interest, incentive subsidies, shared security rewards from re-staking, or even layered incentives from other protocols... Recently, someone also complained that the stacking of yields is like a "matryoshka doll," and indeed, the more layers there are, the risk isn't linear; you simply can't tell how much you're actually exposed to. I can hard-code parameters in my quantitative backtests, but on-chain contract upgrades, permissions, multi-signature setups, liquidation mechanisms—anything could unexpectedly change at any time. I’ll stop being greedy for now and first revoke the permissions I previously granted haphazardly.