The MiCA and GENIUS bills have split the stablecoin sector in half; it's time to choose a side.

View Original
MeNews
The divergence in stablecoin architecture intensifies: regulation promotes competition between the "ticket-based cash" and "bank deposit-type tokens" routes
The global financial system is entering a phase of structural differentiation, with the total market capitalization of stablecoins at around $323.4 billion. In the future, a digital dollar may have to choose between “bearer-style stablecoins” and “bank deposit tokenization”: the former enables instant settlement, reduces intermediary risk, and is closer to on-chain cash; the latter follows the traditional banking system, with stricter KYC and clearing requirements and limited cross-chain interoperability. MiCA and the GENIUS bill are accelerating this split: the former separates regulatory oversight for e-money, while the latter requires 100% cash and short-term U.S. Treasury reserves, affecting payment characteristics and cross-border status—improving efficiency but also carrying liquidity risk.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pinned