Lately, looking at a bunch of project materials has been a bit overwhelming, and the whitepapers are so elaborate that it makes me more cautious. Beginners want to see "credibility," and my simple method is to first check three things: Is there long-term activity on GitHub (not just a few commits and then no more), does the audit report clearly state the issues + have they actually been fixed afterward, is the upgrade permission multi-signature/time lock, who are the signers, can they be replaced, and are there one-click upgrade options that are "surprisingly convenient." Honestly, no matter how many promises are made, on-chain permissions are more reliable. Recently, Meme and celebrity endorsements have drawn attention again, and I really believe that old players' advice to "don't take the last baton"… Anyway, I’ll first review the permission structure and execution records to feel more at ease.