Just stumbled upon something wild about British PMs and their wealth trajectories. The gap between entering and leaving office is absolutely insane for some of them.

Let me break down the most interesting cases. Rishi Sunak basically stayed flat at 900M+, which makes sense given he was already loaded before taking office. But then you've got Tony Blair going from 1M to 70M - that's a 70x jump. Margaret Thatcher pulled a similar move, jumping from 10M to 60M. Clearly there's money to be made in the top job if you know how to play it.

Now here's where it gets interesting - john major net worth actually went from 1M to 6M during his tenure. Not as dramatic as Blair or Thatcher, but still a solid 6x increase. When you look at john major net worth in that context, it shows a clear pattern among PMs who knew how to leverage their position.

David Cameron is another wild one - started at 50M and ended at 70M. That's already wealthy and got wealthier. Compare that to someone like Keir Starmer who's holding steady around 8M, or Liz Truss who barely moved from 10M to 12M.

The real outliers though? Winston Churchill (10M to 15M), Harold Macmillan (15M to 20M), and John Major's 6M gain all seem modest compared to the Blair and Thatcher era. It's fascinating how much the wealth accumulation pattern shifts depending on when they served and what opportunities were available.

The john major net worth case is actually a middle-ground example - not as extreme as Blair's 70M gain, but definitely showing how the office itself can be a wealth accelerator for those positioned to take advantage. Makes you wonder what factors really drive these numbers up so dramatically for some while others barely budge.