Since it’s been revealed that the Palu incident was an internal test, things just got interesting.
Here’s an approach to verify this: Pull up the top 100 holding addresses before launch, then backtrack to the deposit wallets on exchanges—unless they used coin mixing and isolation for every single transaction, it should be possible to trace all the involved accounts using on-chain data.
The most ridiculous part is that several official accounts went crazy posting Palu memes and merch after launch, and you’re telling me they didn’t buy any tokens themselves? I just don’t buy it.
On-chain data doesn’t lie. Now it’s just a matter of whether anyone is willing to spend the time to dig into it.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidityWitch
· 12-08 06:22
On-chain data speaks for itself; it's obvious at a glance whether those few operation accounts have bought or not.
View OriginalReply0
MetaMisfit
· 12-08 02:31
I'm familiar with this trick; internal test mining has always been an old play in the circle.
On-chain data is truly cold-blooded—whether someone is lying depends on who digs.
The official account keeps shouting that they’re not buying tokens; that logic is really wild.
Reverse tracing is a bit tough—one mixer sneeze and everything’s in chaos.
But honestly, this kind of thing usually can't be found out; it just depends on who's lucky.
View OriginalReply0
PhantomHunter
· 12-05 08:53
Damn, this tactic is really ruthless. They even dare to play like this during internal testing?
View OriginalReply0
WhaleWatcher
· 12-05 08:53
On-chain investigation begins? I'm just waiting to see if anyone actually digs into it.
View OriginalReply0
digital_archaeologist
· 12-05 08:46
On-chain data really can't hide any secrets; someone will definitely dig into this wave.
View OriginalReply0
FlatTax
· 12-05 08:36
The on-chain data is right there; if someone really wanted to check, they would've found out long ago.
Seriously, those people running the official account turn around and sell right away. This trick is way too familiar.
Once you track the Top 100 wallets moving funds to exchanges, all the shady stuff gets exposed.
Interesting. Let's see who has the time to dig into this.
Since it’s been revealed that the Palu incident was an internal test, things just got interesting.
Here’s an approach to verify this:
Pull up the top 100 holding addresses before launch, then backtrack to the deposit wallets on exchanges—unless they used coin mixing and isolation for every single transaction, it should be possible to trace all the involved accounts using on-chain data.
The most ridiculous part is that several official accounts went crazy posting Palu memes and merch after launch, and you’re telling me they didn’t buy any tokens themselves? I just don’t buy it.
On-chain data doesn’t lie. Now it’s just a matter of whether anyone is willing to spend the time to dig into it.