On August 30, Jin10 reported that seven judges of the U.S. Court of Appeals upheld the International Trade Court's May ruling, with a vote of 4 to 3, stating that Trump improperly invoked an emergency decree to impose tariffs, exceeding presidential authority. Henrietta Treyz, the economic policy research director at Veda Partners, said: "The 7 to 4 ruling indicates that tariffs are not dead. Typically, the Supreme Court does not hear cases with the same ruling from two lower courts, but the divided ruling of 7 to 4 and the strong pressure from the White House may push the Supreme Court to hear this case."
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Analysis: Disagreements over the ruling on Trump's tariffs may prompt the Supreme Court to hear the case.
On August 30, Jin10 reported that seven judges of the U.S. Court of Appeals upheld the International Trade Court's May ruling, with a vote of 4 to 3, stating that Trump improperly invoked an emergency decree to impose tariffs, exceeding presidential authority. Henrietta Treyz, the economic policy research director at Veda Partners, said: "The 7 to 4 ruling indicates that tariffs are not dead. Typically, the Supreme Court does not hear cases with the same ruling from two lower courts, but the divided ruling of 7 to 4 and the strong pressure from the White House may push the Supreme Court to hear this case."